The Changing Nature of Christian College Presidents?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5b47/f5b47ca02520125c9ce52298ada48a95ae7429aa" alt=""
This was probably inevitable. Still, as one views the selection of these future leaders, one wonders how much time is spent evaluating the candidate's theological insights and views, considering whether that candidate best represents the institution's goals in service to the Synod. Recently Concordia Theological Seminary - Ft. Wayne chose a new president as well. The Rev. Dr. Lawrence Rast certainly brings impeccable credentials as a theologian. Maybe things are different with seminaries as opposed to the universities. Yet should they be? We prepare our future teachers and other professional church workers at these institutions, so we have a stake in their theological maturity. Why should a president here be any less of a leader in the teaching of the faith than at a seminary. I have nothing against the Rev. Ries. Nevertheless, he does not impress me as a theologian. His service to the college has been in administrative and financial roles. Likewise was his service to the church-at-large. When talking about his church experience the main things touted was the tremendous growth his congregation experienced. Then again, his pastor-mentor was the Rev. Dr. Guido Merkens, one of the early mega-church pastors.
I have not examined the other Concordias to see what different directions may be afoot, but I do wonder. My fear, though, is that with faculty charged with the instruction of our future church leaders, we need leaders prepared to hold them to account and supportive of the Synod's overall theology. I pray that Ries can be such a man for his own time.
Comments