Should "Discussions" Establish Doctrine and Practice?

Those promoting the eventuality of women's ordination in the LCMS continue to insist that we still need a "Synod-wide discussion" on the issue in order to finally put it to rest.  This troubles me.  Don't get me wrong, I'm all for discussion and debate.  It clarifies positions and sharpens points of contention.  Yet when it comes to what the church teaches and practices as a matter of public conviction, deciding on the basis of a "discussion" seems fraught with all kinds of pit falls.  From my vantage point the ELCA tried this and eventually gave in to the political and social pressure surrounding "gay rights."  Theological rationale was given, but one wonders how much of the theology was driven by "Synod wide discussion."  Such a discussion will only provide resolution for those seeking the outcome of women's ordination when it finally makes it 'legal' in Synod.  Even if we took a Synod-wide vote it would remain unsettled.  Why?  Someone would insist that proper representation was not given.  Others would claim that key voices were left out of the discussion, at least in terms of public exposure.  Naturally it is unreasonable to expect that every rank-and-file member of the denomination would or could vote on such an issue.  That being the case, how do we ultimately decide what is fair?  We have already voted on this in convention before, so apparently that is not the equitable route to take.  So what is the better way?  OWN began a Facebook page as a start, but anyone following it will see that it bogged down in the same general disagreements seen elsewhere.  They have now started a new 'forum' for a new discussion.  And where will that lead?  No further than the last discussion.

What bothers we most of all is that the historic and early church catholic has determined its theology not by popular discussion, but by the deliberations of its trusted theologians and leaders gathered in official conclave. Can you imagine the results of the church's theology on the Trinity and the deity of Christ if the Arians had been given a significant 'voice' in the Trinitarian and Christological debates of the third century?   Given their control of certain geographical areas and access to secular power we might all be practicing Jehovah's Witnesses if we had gone down that track. 

No, popular discussion has never been the church's means of settling on doctrine, and I know that the LCMS is not going to go down that road now. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Firefighter's Cross

Image
[Note: A similar article to this will be shared with my department at their next meeting. During this Lenten season when we are meditating on the significance and meaning of the Passion of our Lord and the Cross at Golgotha, it seemed like one way to offer a witness to the department that captured their interest and yet was not too heavy.] [Editorial Note: In response to a recent comment on this article I have made some changes to the original version of this article especially in regard to references to the so-called St. Florian's Cross. For any confusion the previous unreferenced information may have caused I apologize. I hope that the changes are satisfactory.] THE STORY OF THE MALTESE CROSS In many ways the familiar symbol to the right requires no explanation. It is the universal insignia of firefighting nationwide. Yet the precise origins of this symbol are less clear. The most popular explanation proposes its beginning in the far distant past of medieval Crusaders fi...
Read more

Historical Roots of the Warham Guild Hood

Image
In doing just a little checking on the internet, it's interesting to see how the Warham Guild hood, which I have as part of my STM degree attire, is actually a throwback to the Medieval hood. One article notes "the work of the Warham Guild in its imaginative renderings of medieval hoods" (reference is from here ). Again, here is my hood: The Medieval hood, which was originally a very practical outer garment to cover a person's head and shoulders, protecting both from the elements, bears striking resemblance to this revived form: This hood was also a part of the garb of monks in that era. The Medieval hood, in some cases, also had what is known as a "liripipe," a long tail hanging from the back of a hood. You can see the modern stylized version of this on my own hood. From an article on "Academic hood development" we read that "By 1463 the favourite dress of doctors was the hood with round bell-shaped cape, and the lir...
Read more

Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed

Image
According to a recent documentary, for all the talk about academic freedom in the world of the large American university system, it would seem that it extends only as far as the system defines it - especially with regards to the subject of origins and science. Noted speechwriter Ben Stein stars as host of the film Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed. Dr. Angus Menuge, professor of philosophy at CUW, highlights the film in an article included in the Concordia University - Wisconsin magazine Concordian , including some seemingly revealing details about the expulsion of talented scientists who apparently were ‘expelled‘ from their positions for mentioning the theory of Intelligent Design: “In the current climate, even when academicians have a relevant doctorate and a track-record of peer-reviewed publication, their careers suffer if they argue that the scientific evidence points to an intelligent source involved in the creation of the world. In 1992, Dean Kenyon, a biology professor at ...
Read more