Bible Textbook for Public Schools?


I recently encountered an ad that read: "Bring this academic Bible elective to your public high school - Widely acclaimed textbook: The Bible and Its Influence." The textbook (written by Cullen Schippe and Chuck Stetson), it is claimed, meets the legal standard set by National School Board Association, is acclaimed by the national media, and was used in 29 states in its first year. Naturally I went to Amazon.com to read any reviews the book received. I was sure there would be one nasty one in the bunch. However, the only slightly negative review had to do with its cost, which admittedly is high: over $50. Now, I didn't do a thorough search, so I'm sure there are those out there who feel that this book is a concerted effort to force religion into the public sector (Oh, excuse me, I did find one place that felt this way. The site was called "Woman Thou Art God." I actually looked it up. Definitely a very angry feminist. It was hard to take her too seriously.)

In all honesty I'm not quite sure what to think of this book. Part of me is suspicious when the media and religious leaders are all praising the same thing. Makes we wonder what they left out rather than what they put in. As the publisher claims: "it respects the views of major faith groups, while endorsing none." Furthermore, the publisher also notes that "It presents a straightforward explanation of the narratives, themes, and characters of the Bible, written to respect, but not promote various faith perspectives."

The point of the text, it would seem, is to present the scriptures as literature, and to examine their influence on our culture. However, for the believer the scriptures are never simply a neutral collection of stories and narratives. In fact, to attempt to understand the Bible apart from Christ is not only to miss the whole point of what it is saying, but it does it an incredible injustice. The Bible is The Word, an enfleshed Word in Christ.

Both Jewish and Christian leaders endorse this book. Now I know that the "golden thread" of Christ is missing. Why would a Jewish religious leader acknowledge, as Christian would, that Christ is the thematic thread that unites the entire 66 books? I'm sorry, I just can't get excited about the book. Should public school teachers acknowledge the place and role of the Bible in history and culture. Sure! But to attempt to form an entire curriculum to present it as merely an influential book would seem shallow to anyone who has read it and received from it the hope and joy it promises. The Bible is unique in all of literature, even though it shares literary qualities with all great works. But to present it in such a way as to rob it of its right to proclaim Christ? Not for me.

Comments

Zorak said…
Hi Reverend,

May I humbly suggest that you actually read the book for yourself before making a final decision?

The book does explain that Christians understand the Old Testament as containing multiple references to Christ, (and explains specific examples of this like Isaiah - suffering servant) but that Jews do not read it that way. Because it describes the different views factually, it can be endorsed by both Christians and Jews. It does not tell the student which one is the correct view, but students who ask are directed to their faith leader.

Some sample pages from the book are available here, if you don't want to buy it.

Thank you and God Bless!
March 9, 2007 at 5:50:00 PM PST
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Firefighter's Cross

Image
[Note: A similar article to this will be shared with my department at their next meeting. During this Lenten season when we are meditating on the significance and meaning of the Passion of our Lord and the Cross at Golgotha, it seemed like one way to offer a witness to the department that captured their interest and yet was not too heavy.] [Editorial Note: In response to a recent comment on this article I have made some changes to the original version of this article especially in regard to references to the so-called St. Florian's Cross. For any confusion the previous unreferenced information may have caused I apologize. I hope that the changes are satisfactory.] THE STORY OF THE MALTESE CROSS In many ways the familiar symbol to the right requires no explanation. It is the universal insignia of firefighting nationwide. Yet the precise origins of this symbol are less clear. The most popular explanation proposes its beginning in the far distant past of medieval Crusaders fi...
Read more

Historical Roots of the Warham Guild Hood

Image
In doing just a little checking on the internet, it's interesting to see how the Warham Guild hood, which I have as part of my STM degree attire, is actually a throwback to the Medieval hood. One article notes "the work of the Warham Guild in its imaginative renderings of medieval hoods" (reference is from here ). Again, here is my hood: The Medieval hood, which was originally a very practical outer garment to cover a person's head and shoulders, protecting both from the elements, bears striking resemblance to this revived form: This hood was also a part of the garb of monks in that era. The Medieval hood, in some cases, also had what is known as a "liripipe," a long tail hanging from the back of a hood. You can see the modern stylized version of this on my own hood. From an article on "Academic hood development" we read that "By 1463 the favourite dress of doctors was the hood with round bell-shaped cape, and the lir...
Read more

Five Things You Shoud Not Say at Funerals

Image
After preparing for a couple of funerals here recently, I was reminded of an article I read a few years back in the Concordia Journal entitled, "Five Things You Should Not Say at Funerals" (October 2003). My one pet peeve with funerals I attend as a guest is the all too frequent absence of Christ crucified and risen. Too often the content is trivial and shallow and centered on the life and times of the deceased instead of our Lord. However, even after several years of ministry, I realize that I may not have always presented the fullness of our hope as accurately as possible, even while preaching Christ. Dr. Jeff Gibbs gave me pause to think. The five things he tells us we ought not to say: 1.) "Bob has received the crown of righteousness, and he has heard the Lord say, 'Well done, good and faithful servant.'" Gibbs reason for not saying this: Like some of the phrases to follow, these are words that point to the final Day of Judgment, not to th...
Read more